A social psychological perspective on
Melanie Manchot’s exhibition ‘Gathering’
Fabrica gallery, Brighton, 8 October - 27 November 2011
Psychology has much to say about crowds, their power, and the strong
emotions that arise from participation in them. This article describes recent
research that addresses the themes on display in Melanie Manchot’s two video
installations, ‘Celebration (Cyprus Street)’ and ‘Walk (Square)’.
Coming together
Celebration (Cyprus Street) is inspired by the tradition of street
parties in London’s East End and was developed over a period of six months with
the residents of Cyprus Street. It was filmed as a
single continuous event, through the technique of tracking through the streets
and the crowds. The participants could be described as diverse; but they are
also together, as one, and it is obvious that they are present on the street to
be with one another and that this is a joyful experience.
The film draws our attention to an
apparent paradox of everyday experience. On the one hand, we seek out and enjoy
crowds. When we celebrate we want to do so with others. We enjoy festivals,
music and sports events when there is an atmosphere that only a big crowd can
provide. But we also find some crowding aversive. We value our ‘personal
space’. Recent research has addressed this apparent paradox. (1) This research
suggests that, in order to understand why being in a crowd can produce such
varied reactions in the same person, we need to conceptualize the self as
multiple and variable, based on our various group memberships. The same degree
of density or proximity is experienced positively or negatively depending upon
which of our group identities is salient.
This argument can be illustrated with a
recent experimental study.(2) Participants were each invited to pull up a chair
to wherever they felt most comfortable, in anticipation of discussion with a
stranger. Prior to this, they had been given a bogus ‘test’ of their
‘communication styles’. They were told either that the stranger was of the same
‘communication style’ as them or a different style. In fact the test and hence
the two ‘groups’ were meaningless. But the participants didn’t know this, and
reliably positioned the chair closer to the expected ‘in-group’ member than the
‘out-group’ member. This result suggests that our enjoyment (or dislike) of
closeness with others, whether interpersonally or in a crowd, is shaped by
whichever of our various identities is salient, rather than by a fixed
‘personal space’ boundary.
The effect shown in this experiment has been replicated with a range of
other measures,(3) including self-reported preferences, negative and positive
emotions, and even expressions of disgust: people report less disgust for
exactly the same body odour when it is categorized as ‘us’ than when it is
‘them’!
Studies of actual crowds provide some real-world validation for this
analysis. In November 2007, a march and rally was organized by UNISON, the
public sector workers’ union, to protest against the then government’s attempts
to privatize the NHS. We surveyed over 100 demonstrators, and found that those
who identified most with the crowd sought a more central (i.e., more crowded)
physical location, and hence closer proximity, to their fellow crowd members.
In addition, immersion in the crowd was associated with collective joy.
Specifically, those who identified most with the crowd reported a more positive
experience, in part due to being in close physical proximity to their fellow
crowd members.(4)
Taken together therefore, the recent research says something about why
we gather together with others (because they identify in the same way that we
do), and why it feels good when we are in a crowd with these others.(5) But
when we come together as a crowd, we often move and act together. What are the psychological effects of such collective
coordination?
Acting together
In Melanie Manchot’s video installation ‘Walk (Square)’, 1000 school children are shown moving in
lines toward a city square, where they merge to become part of a huge
choreographed crowd. They then move together, synchronizing their walking to
form patterns that change, dissolve and re-form.
Walk (Square) is the result of an event constructed by Manchot but
inspired by real situations involving walking as a form of expression:
processions, parades, pilgrimages and protest marches, such as those in the
recent wave of mass demonstrations from the UK to the Middle East.
If the striking choreography
leads the viewer to see the performers as a single entity, it is possible that
the performers themselves may do the same, for this is what recent research in
social psychology has found. In the NHS demonstration study described above, we
found that participants’ sense of being psychologically part of the crowd – their social identity
– increased through participation in the event. Collective joy also increased
over the course of the event, and was partly due to this shared social
identity.
Our explanation for these results was that physical co-action in a group
or crowd can dissolve the psychological boundary between individual and
collective, while intensifying our positive emotional responses. But a field
study like this cannot rule out the possibility that some other factor was
responsible (such as passing of time, or communication, or changing relations
with outside groups).
A follow-up study was carried out in the psychology laboratory, which
enabled us to control all the conditions and so identify any causal relations,
rather than simply infer them as in the demonstration study.(6) Participants
arranged at close physical proximity in small groups were asked to learn
clapping patterns of the type heard in football crowds. They performed the
patterns in the group, either in synchrony or individually. As predicted, only
participants who synchronized their movement came to see themselves as part of
their group and experienced increased positive emotion.
These studies therefore show
that moving together as one in time can serve to construct a collective
identity. This is why rallies and marches are important in building social
movements. It is no coincidence that Melanie Manchot’s two works are inspired not only by mass pilgrimages, processions, and parades, but
also by recent mass demonstrations across both the Arab world and the UK.
A marching crowd is not only
expressive, and therefore rich in meanings and symbols, but is also purposive.
That purpose may be social change. Of course, most crowds do not aim to bring about social change.
Many crowds in fact only exist to reproduce or validate the status quo – for
example through religious ritual or national ceremony. But social change very
often involves crowds.(7) Even crowd events that are supposed to have a
cathartic function may also include a rebellious undertone, threatening to the
status quo. Early carnivals had this dual quality;(8) and riots are often
described as having a ‘carnival atmosphere’, by both participants and those who
observe them.(9)
Crowds and power therefore have a long association. Recent research has
examined the psychology of power-change – empowerment
– in people’s experience of crowd events. Studies of riots, anti-capitalist
demonstrations, anti-roads direct actions, Reclaim the Streets parties,
anti-war marches, as well as numerous experimental simulations, have each shown
the same pattern. We feel more able to take collective actions that we define
as legitimate, yet which may not be permitted by others outside the crowd (such
as the authorities and police), when we perceive that others in the crowd support us in our aims and action.(10)
Comparative studies of protest movements add that a sense of collective agency can be both cause and consequence
of such collective action.(11) In order to act, we need to believe we are capable of such action. But, through our
action and its impact on the world, we authenticate and confirm our own
collective agency; the material results of our collective actions stand as
evidence of the power of our collective identities.
Finally, research on activists’ experiences shows that collective
actions that shift or challenge existing power relations feel joyful, exhilarating and even euphoric.
(12) They feel good; and they may even be good for us, since the sense of
agency and social support associated with collective action are established
predictors of wellbeing.(13)
Melanie Manchot’s two works ‘Celebration (Cyprus Street)’ and ‘Walk (Square)’ are about the relationship between
individual and crowd, about our collective identities, and about how we behave in public
space. A central message is that, through its action, the crowd can both
express and construct our sense of self. Recent research in
social psychology suggests that the power of the crowd – the collective
support, collective agency and collective joy it affords – comes not from a loss of self, but from the augmentation of the self. To paraphrase
John Turner, a founder of the social identity approach in group psychology, the
psychological crowd ‘is precisely the
adaptive mechanism that frees human beings from the restrictions of, and allows
them to be more than just, individual persons’ (Turner, 1987, p. 67).(14)
John Drury and David Novelli
This article was
commissioned by Fabrica and part funded by the European Union Two Seas
Programme. It extends work that the gallery has carried out since 2009 linking artists’
perspectives with current scientific research at leading Universities in the
UK.
Dr John Drury is senior lecturer in social psychology
at the University of Sussex. His research interests include crowd empowerment,
solidarity in mass emergencies, and positive experiences of ‘crowding’. His
research includes studies of anti-poll tax riots and anti-roads direct action
and survivor responses to the London bombings. He has just edited, with Dr
Clifford Stott, a special issue of the journal Contemporary Social Science on the topic of crowds. He is currently
supervising research projects on the Hajj to Mecca, collective action and
wellbeing, and crowd communication by the emergency services.
Dr David Novelli is a social psychologist at the University
of Sussex, specialising in crowds. His research focuses on how social
identities and group memberships influence the ways in which we experience
being in crowds, and how acting together in crowds can affect positive emotions
and feelings of solidarity. This year David was awarded the annual prize for
the country’s most outstanding doctoral thesis by the British Psychological
Society. He is currently looking at how our (positive and negative) experiences
at large-scale music events can be shaped by assumptions about crowds held by
those who organize and manage such events.
References
1.
Novelli,
D. (2010). The social psychology of spatiality and crowding. Unpublished DPhil
thesis. University of Sussex. Available online at http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/6275/1/Novelli,_David_Lee.pdf
2.
Novelli,
D., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2010). Come together: Two studies concerning
the impact of group relations on ‘personal space’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 223–236.
3.
Novelli, D. (2010) op.
cit.
4.
Novelli,
D., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2011). The relationship between psychological
and physical group processes and their impact on the experience of crowding:
Evidence from a field study. Unpublished manuscript. University of Sussex.
5.
Novelli,
D. (2010) op. cit.
6.
Novelli, D., Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2011). Synchronized movement as a cause of social identity and positive emotion. Unpublished
manuscript. University of Sussex.
7.
Ackerman,
P., & Kruegler, C. (1994). Strategic
nonviolent conflict: The dynamics of people power in the twentieth century.
Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
Davis,
N. Z. (1971). The reasons of misrule: Youth groups and charivaris in
sixteenth-century France. Past and
Present, 50, 41-75.
9.
Reicher,
S. & Potter, J. (1985). Psychological theory as intergroup perspective: A
comparative analysis of ‘scientific’ and ‘lay’ accounts of crowd events. Human Relations, 38, 167-189.
10.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological
empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707-725.
11. Drury, J., &
Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of
collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-58
12. Drury, J.,
Cocking, C., Beale, J., Hanson, C., & Rapley, F. (2005). The phenomenology
of empowerment in collective action. British
Journal of Social Psychology, 44,
309-328
- Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1037-1052.
- Turner, J. (1987). A self-categorisation theory. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S., Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford: Blackwell.
Background
Melanie Manchot's 2010 film Celebration (Cyprus Street) is a portrait of an East End
neighbourhood, for which Manchot worked closely with local residents to create
a street party, which she filmed. Her more recent work Walk (Square) invites young participants
to walk together and undertake basic choreographed movements. Celebration
(Cyprus Street) was commissioned by Film and Video Umbrella, and Walk (Square)
by Deichtorhallen Museum in Hamburg; both were exhibited at Fabrica gallery in
Brighton, in October / November 2011. The exhibition ran at the same time as
White Night, an event that invited local residents to take part in cultural
activity throughout the night and in so doing created a new kind of social space
which connected the city in a new way.
Manchot described the focus of these works for photography
publication Vignette in October 2011: “Both
Celebration (Cyprus Street) and Walk (Square) investigate a position between
individual and collective experience, and aim to do so through group
portraiture. In these works I set up an event with participants who are,
on the whole, strangers to me and to each other, and who come together through
the processes of the work. The notion of ‘event’ is central to these
works as it is the event, the proposition of a performative situation that the
participants engage with – and that they then fill with their action.
Both works consciously chart a space – and a tension – between choreography and documentation, between construction and chaos. And in many ways this applies to my practice in general, this interest in setting up situations, constructing a scenario, which then develops its very own dynamic, where the people then enact their motivations.
Celebration (Cyprus Street) and Walk (Square) are both based on real events, ‘real life’ so to speak: in one case on historic street parties and the social function they embodied and the other on the recent surge of demonstrations, marches, protests both in the UK and around the world. But rather than being political as such, in the case of both works it is the making of art, of a moving image project, that brings people onto the streets. And public space, the streets and squares we share as social space are another theme that runs through these works as well as through much of my practice”
Both works consciously chart a space – and a tension – between choreography and documentation, between construction and chaos. And in many ways this applies to my practice in general, this interest in setting up situations, constructing a scenario, which then develops its very own dynamic, where the people then enact their motivations.
Celebration (Cyprus Street) and Walk (Square) are both based on real events, ‘real life’ so to speak: in one case on historic street parties and the social function they embodied and the other on the recent surge of demonstrations, marches, protests both in the UK and around the world. But rather than being political as such, in the case of both works it is the making of art, of a moving image project, that brings people onto the streets. And public space, the streets and squares we share as social space are another theme that runs through these works as well as through much of my practice”
Acknowledgements
Celebration
(Cyprus Street) was commissioned by Film and Video Umbrella and supported by
Arts Council England. Funded by Film London and the UK Film Council Digital Archive
Film Fund and supported by the National Lottery.
Walk (Square) was commissioned by Deichtorhallen and Kulturforum 21, Hamburg for the exhibition Wunder. Walk (Square) received additional funding from Film and Video Umbrella. The activities connected to the exhibition are also supported by Brighton & Hove Council, the IRIS Contemporary Art Network and Interreg, a European Union funding programme aimed at dialogue between neighbouring European countries.
Walk (Square) was commissioned by Deichtorhallen and Kulturforum 21, Hamburg for the exhibition Wunder. Walk (Square) received additional funding from Film and Video Umbrella. The activities connected to the exhibition are also supported by Brighton & Hove Council, the IRIS Contemporary Art Network and Interreg, a European Union funding programme aimed at dialogue between neighbouring European countries.
Gathering – 8 October – 27 November 2011 – Fabrica, Brighton UK
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.